US declines to charge Merrick Garland for contempt of Congress

The Department of Justice has decided not to pursue criminal charges against Attorney General Merrick Garland for contempt of Congress. This decision comes after the House of Representatives voted to hold Garland in contempt for failing to turn over documents related to the Trump administration’s handling of the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

The DOJ’s decision not to charge Garland is a significant development in the ongoing battle between Congress and the executive branch over the release of information related to the Capitol riot. Many lawmakers had called for Garland to be held accountable for his refusal to comply with the House’s subpoena, arguing that he was obstructing Congress’s oversight duties.

In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Bradley Weinsheimer explained the department’s decision not to pursue charges against Garland. Weinsheimer cited the fact that Garland had made a good faith effort to comply with the subpoena, but was unable to do so due to concerns about the impact on ongoing investigations and the privacy rights of individuals mentioned in the documents.

While some members of Congress may be disappointed by the DOJ’s decision not to charge Garland, others have praised the department for upholding the principle of executive privilege and protecting the integrity of ongoing investigations. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler said in a statement that he respected the department’s decision and would continue to work with Garland to address Congress’s concerns.

Overall, the decision not to charge Garland for contempt of Congress is a reminder of the delicate balance between the branches of government and the importance of respecting the rule of law. As the investigation into the Capitol riot continues, it will be crucial for both Congress and the executive branch to work together to ensure accountability and transparency.

Scroll to Top